| 英文題名 | Does acupuncture therapy with metal needles develop from Bian stone therapy?
|
| 個人著者 | 白興華
|
| 團體著者 | |
| 第一著者單位 | 北京 北京中醫(yī)藥大學針灸學院 100029
|
| 第一著者地址 | 北京
|
| 出處 | 中國針灸.-2004,24(3) 215-217
|
| 中文文摘 | 通過分析有關(guān)砭石和針刺療法的傳世文獻和最新考古發(fā)現(xiàn),對比中國傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學與其他古代醫(yī)學尤其古希臘醫(yī)學之間的異同,并結(jié)合恰當?shù)倪壿嬐评?認為砭石是一種刀狀的醫(yī)療工具,主要用途是切癰排膿,也被用來放血,與以毫針為代表的針刺療法有著本質(zhì)的區(qū)別。針刺療法的發(fā)明及應(yīng)用與砭石療法沒有直接關(guān)系,"針源于砭"的觀點是錯誤的。
|
| 英文文摘 | After analysis of both extant documents and newly unearthed relics related to Bian stone therapy and acupuncture, comparison of traditional Chinese medicine with other ancient medical systems, especially ancient Greek medicine, the correct reasoning, it is considered that Bian stone is a knife-like medical instrument and is used primarily for discharge of pus or blood-letting in antiquity, the difference between Bian stone therapy and acupuncture is essential. The invention and applicationof acupuncture have no direct relation with Bian stone therapy. The view point, "acupuncture therapy with metal needles develops from Bian stone therapy " is wrong.
|
| 文獻類型 | 歷史文獻(PT); 中文摘要; 英文摘要
|
| 語種 | |
| 主題詞 | 中醫(yī)醫(yī)學史；考證；針刺/歷史；砭石；《內(nèi)經(jīng)》
|
| 特征詞 | |
| 醫(yī)學史 | 醫(yī)學史，戰(zhàn)國 (475-221 B.C.)；醫(yī)學史，秦朝(221-207 B.C)；醫(yī)學史，漢朝(206 B.C -220 A.D)；醫(yī)學史，古代 (公元500年以前)
|
| 資助類別 | |
| 主題姓名 | |
| 劑型 | |
| 關(guān)鍵詞 | |
| 分類號 | R2-09; R2; R245; R245.3
|
| 病例數(shù) | |
| 實驗動物品種 | |
| 中藥藥理作用 | |
| 西藥藥理作用 |
